Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharday (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Does not show how she meets ENT or GNG. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Sharday
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very poorly sourced article about NN model. Fails WP:PORNBIO, no other claims to notability, no actual assertion of notability. Deleted once previously, survived AFD on recreation on the invalid basis that a promotional "award" from a non-notable magazine, in the nature of "Employee of the Year," demonstrated notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, though she was Employee Of The Year twice running. 81.110.104.91 (talk) 22:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No apparent Notability as per either WP:Pornbio, or more generalized criteria.  Her one, apparently non-Reliable (porn) source actually crashed by browser.  I enjoyed running a Google Image search on her, but that doesn't confer Notability, needless to say. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 02:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep meets critera of WP:ENT and WP:GNG. WP:PORNBIO is irrelevant because subject is not a pornographic actress. Chuthya (talk) 11:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Since she has zero Reliable sources (and only one unReliable source of any kind, which I'm inclined to regard as a Dead Link, by virtue of it having crashed by browser), its clear she doesn't meet WP:GNG.  Its also very far from certain that appearances in several nudie magazines meets WP:ENT. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Chuthya's claim that the subject meets WP:ENT or WP:GNG criteria doesn't seem to hold up. I couldn't follow the weblink either, and I agree with KevenOkeeffe that that doesn't look like a reliable source. Even if it were reliable, would it provide enough coverage of her? If reliable sources that give substantial coverage to the subject can be presented, my objection should be discounted. -- Noroton (talk) 01:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.