Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shareek-e-Hayat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of programs broadcast by Hum TV as a viable ATD Star   Mississippi  15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Shareek-e-Hayat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to meet GNG as i couldn't find sig/in depth coverage such as reviews etc. All I could find is some namechecks coverage. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 09:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Hum_TV - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination. I am doubting WP:Before is done or not. It was broadcasted in 2013 and many Pakistani newspapers remove old coverage from their websites. Why a series broadcasted in 2013 need nomination discussion after more than a decade and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be nominated and removed from wikipidea. It received some coverage as one can see here Libraa2019 (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, This is a WP:ATA. Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found. If you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions? — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 09:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.