Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharh-e Esm (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. New sources came into light during the course of the discussion. (non-admin closure) — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 08:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Sharh-e Esm (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:N. The references all are unreliable and dependent sources (they all are government news agencies). It's also deleted in fawiki for WP:N. Ladsgroupoverleg 18:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  20:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, Apart from the point that it is an important/known biography book concerning the highest-ranking position in Iran (supreme-leader) (written by a known writer, i.e. Hedayatollah Behboudi); I added more reliable references --among 2 related references from BBC NEWS, to cover its notability/reliability more), i.e. BBC, and that (BBC); Good luck. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non-notable. It's also deleted in fawiki. Nika2020 (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned above, a part from the available reliable references in the article, I added some other reliable sources (among BBC, such as: this BBC NEWS and that (BBC)) which have mentioned/surveyed the book directly; meanwhile, there are more other reliable references that have engaged in the book, such as: Radiofarda and this Radiofarda; etc. which explicitly shows its notability. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 07:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I wonder why it was deleted in fa.wiki but it looks to me to pass GNG. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on what I can read with google translate, the two BBC sources look sufficient for WP:BOOKCRIT. ~ oulfis 🌸 (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.