Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon English High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per evaluation of sources by User:Sonofstar. Missvain (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Sharon English High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about non-notable high school, does not pass WP:NSCHOOL and seems to be original research. Rusf10 (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: I have revised the text and added some sources. It is still weak, but I think there is enough keep the article. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Has many sources that can be refered to keep this article. --Rockstar250802 (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Surely fails NSCHOOL and WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Nothing notable to satisfy the criteria. Besides of that the article full of unsupported claims and trivia. Kolma8 (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources in the article are only extremely trivial name drops and I can't find anything that isn't. So, this clearly doesn't meet the notability guidelines of direct, in-depth coverage in multiple sources. I'd be happy to change my vote to keep if someone can find WP:THREE references that do though. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, , all are bogus. Noindepth coverage.Sonofstar (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article fails NSCHOOLS. The passing references in two sources and one about sports do not reach BASIC put together. VV 19:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - it has some indicia of notability, but is not quite there. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.