Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Kinney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as another week has no disputes about the current sources, thus solving "no sources" and the two prior deletes gave no other objections and these also differ from the nomination's then-current examination (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Sharon Kinney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Of the 13 references listed, 9 are from an "interview" for which no link is given. Jb45424 (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

*Delete - due to lack of sources and reliability issues Inkedotly (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC) — Inkedotly (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: In light of newly discovered sources...
 * Delete due to lack of sources. Could change if sources are found. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:25, 8 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete article in its current form. Sources are all dead links or subject's own statements. Agricola44 (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep. The article is a bit bloated and badly sourced in its current form but she appears to pass WP:GNG for her film choreography (e.g. see Washington Post, Style Weekly). There's also passing book coverage of her in connection with Twyla Tharp and the Robin Williams Popeye movie  which adds depth to her story despite not really being enough by itself. And the American Dance Festival  Distinguished Teaching Award  also looks significant, although (despite its name) not really the kind of endowed chair recognized by WP:PROF (it's an award by a dance festival, not a funded professorial position at a university). —David Eppstein (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  15:49, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep the additional references seem sufficient for GNG; the article is still almost entirely based off of a personal interview, which as a primary source should be somewhere other than Wikipedia. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the article is poorly sourced but appears notable per Washington Post and Style Weekly; the article should be rewritten to incorporate additional sources and downplay the interview, but the appropriate course is to flag the article for additional citations rather than deleting it. Newimpartial (talk) 07:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as long as the Post and other sources are added. Bearian (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.