Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Mann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:26, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Sharon Mann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is a non-notable actor - biography and filmography contain several red-link works, meaning that they are not Wikipedia notable, as well as a severe lack of coverage. Only notable work is Code Lyoko. MizukaS (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. The only supporting RS is 1 trivial mention in LAT. Far from enough. Agricola44 (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Actors and actresses are not handed an automatic free pass over WP:NACTOR just because roles are listed in the article — the notability test is not "has had roles", but "has received enough reliable source coverage about her to clear WP:GNG for having had roles". But the only sources here are a blurb which mentions her name in the caption to a photograph, but is not substantively about her at all, and a Facebook post. That's not what it takes. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.