Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Osbourne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW - closing early - Peripitus (Talk) 12:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Sharon Osbourne

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject is rich and married to a rock star. So? The article doesn't discuss much that she's actually done that's notable in any fashion. A pittance to some charities, some health issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzmadmike (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Don't be so ridiculous. Rysin3 04:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Subject is famous from having a reality television show made about her husband, herself and their children, and then going on to host talk shows of her own. I'm not even sure this nomination was made in good faith. --Metropolitan90 06:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. If this is a good faith nomination, then I have to call WP:OSTRICH. Extremely notable individual who would be notable if all she did was co-star with her husband in The Osbournes, but she went on to host a talk show as well. 23skidoo 06:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Metropolitan90 and 23skidoo. --Lmblackjack21 06:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per 23skuidoo. Ulysses Zagreb 09:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep huh? Khu  kri  - 09:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Delete?!?! Are you kidding.... ?!?! Mathmo Talk 11:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep screw it, I'll say it: bad faith nom. JuJube 12:04, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.