Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharr mountain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was hard as I tried, I didn't find any differences between the articles, so...redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 15:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Sharr mountain
This is a duplicate of Šar mountain, created for the purpose of vandalism. For more info, compare and  Dijxtra 19:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * merge with Šar mountain. Has some minor differences which could be preserved. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * What does "merge" exactly mean? Please compare the links I provided and you will see that this differences consist of vandalism: User:Ilir pz removed some info from Šar mountain, and when he was reverted, he created this page. --Dijxtra 23:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Niffweed. Capitalistroadster 21:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't merge, it represents the double naming of the location, not the Serbian name, using "Š". Ben uk 20:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge (or delete) - this situation should be dealt with using redirects (for alternate spellings) with qualfication of any exonyms on the main page; the article should use a single, consistent spelling throughout the page (and, as much as possible, throughout the whole of Wikipedia).
 * This particular spelling issue needs to be discussed somewhere (see Priština or Prishtina?) and I would hope we could develop a reasoned debate at (somewhere like) Talk:List of cities in Serbia and Montenegro (is this the most appropriate place? if not, then where?) before bringing a policy proposal to Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)
 * - Nigosh 23:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with you, but not deleting this article would issue a statement that creating duplicate pages to proove a point is a good think. Am I really only one here who finds this article a violation of WP:POINT? --Dijxtra 00:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Dijxtra keeps reverting the double naming of locations in the article, and thus creates the need to have a double article. In order to have a fair article we should either include both names, in Albanian and Serbian, or two separate articles. benny 11:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I prefer not to enter flame wars, but here I must react on behalf of my good name :-) I do not "keep reverting the double naming of locations in the article": a) I reverted the article only once; b) I wasn't the first to revert: the first revert was done by User:Khoikhoi, I just reinforced the revert when User:Ilir pz reverted back to his version which I find bordering with vandalism; c) I didn't revert the double naming, what I did can be seen here and I will again point out that I consider removing a name of a country from the article with no prior discussion an act of vandalism. There. --Dijxtra 11:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.