Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharron Gold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 02:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Sharron Gold

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

(author contested PROD) Only assertions of notability per WP:CREATIVE are not sourced. Complete list of sources includes: IMDB, en.wikipedia, subject's own websites, an amazon product review, and a google books "about" page. No major independent coverage can be found on a quick look through google. Sperril (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Struck part of above. It was actually it was a BLP PROD. References were added which caused the BLP PROD tag to be removed. My apologies. Sperril (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete due to not meeting WP:BASIC with no independent coverage I could find. WP:CREATIVE does not seem to apply to this person as I cannot find any indication that the recent book Spiked has gotten attention. Am willing to reconsider if others can do a better job of researching. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find no significant coverage about her or her works. The claim of her first novel being a German best-seller is not backed by any sources, nor is it specified what best seller list this made.  As for her second novel, I can find no critical reviews of it in reliable sources and being an Amazon "best seller" is not notable. -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. —  Joaquin008  ( talk ) 13:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.