Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shattered Nations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Centrx→talk &bull; 01:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Shattered Nations

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The predecessor to Starcraft. Prodded by me, removed on the basis that as the predecessor of Starcraft it is notable. I think not. Perhaps it could be included in the StarCraft article, but I'd rather just see it deleted. Most of the 247 google hits aren't in English (not that that matters), and some do not even deal with the game. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 13:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactley Wikipedia provides the best and pretty much only details on this game I got my information from WarCraft 2 which had concept art a trailer details and quite simply it would be a huge loss if we deleted this article how else will someone find out information on this game? Jamhaw 16:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)jamhaw
 * Merge to main article on Starcraft. Walton monarchist89 18:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's the only thing on the internet with much details on it.Jamhaw 16:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)jamhaw


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Still delete. Although a merging could be appropriate, I have been unable to find any proper references for this at all being true. While not accusing it of being a hoax, inclusion in Wikipedia requires reliable sources. Jobjörn  (Talk ° contribs) 17:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: A canceled game with no reliable sources on the Internet unquestionably fails WP:GAMES. I would say "merge", but a badly-written article with no sources does not warrant merging. - Chardish 19:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I've barely heard of this, but this is unsourced and unenlightening. Many games go through different iterations before they are finished, witness the future/past mash-up that is Quake. --Dhartung | Talk 05:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * This is one hell of a long AfD! Jobjörn  (Talk ° contribs) 00:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Template added by yours truly, to attract some attention. This needs closing. Now, sleep for me! Jobjörn  (Talk ° contribs) 00:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.