Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaukat Hameed Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep (snowy). Non-admin closure.  Jamie ☆ S93  19:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Shaukat Hameed Khan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems notable, but doesn't appear on any search engines. Maniamin (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

delete No secondary sources suggest notability Kristof15 (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 03:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to pass WP:PROF #6. But it needs to be rewritten to fix the copyvio with this article — as it is now, it is in danger of G11 speedy deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Copyvio issues addressed. -- Banj e  b oi   17:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein. --Crusio (talk) 07:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. As noted by David Eppstein, meets WP:PROF criterion #6 (highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society). Possibly meets WP:PROF criterion #3 as well.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, per David Eppstein. Added a ref sourcing two more of the claims of notability. MuffledThud (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep it has been cleaned up, trimmed of lard and referenced. pablo hablo. 13:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep of improved article. Nice work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons David Eppstein mentioned.  D r e a m Focus  13:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. Unclear why it didn't show in search engines, I had no problems. In any case article has been sourced for notability and now needs expanding which is regular clean-up. -- Banj e  b oi   17:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.