Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Bailey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep per sourcing and improved verification of notability. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Shaun Bailey

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sorry. I nominated this article for deletion but have totally forgotten my password. This is a page about a candidate for elected office who has no other notability. There is clear precedent that candidates for office are not sufficiently notable unless there is some other claim to notability. I don't think any other claim is sufficiently asserted here - it really just seems to be a vanity page. 86.144.83.215 (talk) 00:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC) Text copied from article talk page. ➨ REDVEЯS is always ready to dynamically make tea 11:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:Notability (people). SWik78 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google search reveals easily enough sources to satisfy WP:RS. Apart from the several articles he's written for the Telegraph, there's significant coverage in the Guardian and Daily Mail  and this from Operation Black Vote . Not all prospective candidates are notable - indeed, most usually aren't - but this man has clearly received enough attention to satisfy our guidelines. Terraxos (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. per Terraxos.  Also note the phrase from the Guardian article - that he's an up-and-coming "national figure of repute" implies that he's known for more than just running for this office.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources found by Terraxos which establish his notability Davewild (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.