Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Simpson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Nomination withdrawn. Darkspots (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Shaun Simpson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

It was discussed here that the articles nominated for deletion in that AfD should be put into their own seperate AfD's. This AfD is for the wrestlers mentioned there. It was agreed in the previous AfD that the articles: Shaun Koen, Johnny Palazzio, Steve Debbes, and Steve Cohen (wrestler) should be kept as they are notable. All of the other wrestlers appear to be non-notable. iMat thew   20  08  15:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

These articles are all included in this AfD as well.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -  iMat  thew   20  08  15:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Split up into smaller chunks - Currently, my vote would be: Keep Shaun Simpson and Jean Paul Whittacker as redirects. Keep Jason McGinn and Nightmare, who are mentioned in several articles (McGinn at here, here, here and here, and Nightmare at here). Delete the rest as non-notable with no third-party sources for verifiability. As with the last AfD, I believe this is still too much all at once and should be relisted with a maximum of five (please see my comments near the bottom of the other AfD for the five I mentioned). GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I think Mark Beale should be kept, since he has been mentioned in numerous third-party sources (I've included them in the article). Ajstyles tna roh (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination or keep The original afd was a horrible mess and this is yet another horrible mess. The nominator notes that Shaun Koen should be kept and yet nominates Shaun Simpson for deletion even though Shaun Simpson is apparently nothing more than a redirect to Shaun Koen. Redirects for discussion is the appropriate place to nominate any redirects for deletion though I strongly doubt that there's any valid reason to delete this redirect. Another person has already voted keep for some of the articles and delete for others. This is simply not acceptable. Please withdraw this nomination, do some google search, tag articles with where appropriate, nominate individual articles one at a time where warranted and do not nominate redirects for deletions here. I'm  really trying to avoid calling a spade a spade but if I see another large amount of articles being nominated all at once here with no evidence that the nominator had even bothered to look through each individual article, then I am not going to refrain myself any longer from calling a spade a spade. --Bardin (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I made this AfD because many said that it needed to be made at the other one, and since nobody else did, I did. I guess I withdraw the nomination.. iMat  thew   20  08  19:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.