Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Tuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Shaun Tuck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable living person, non-league footballer only of public interest for a single criminal act. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:NOTNEWS and definitely not WP:NOTABLE CSD-A7 could apply, and possibly G10.Martin 4 5 1  23:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – I agree with Martin451 that it is not notable and that CSD-A7 could apply. United States Man (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable as a sportsman, not notable for his criminal act. GiantSnowman 12:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above, has not played in a fully professional league or senior international football. Conviction is non-notable as WP:BLP1E. Fenix down (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete through A7 per above (, G10 is a stretch in my humble opinion). If I'm seeing this correctly, the player played in the Northern Premier League Premier Division, which does not show up at WP:FPL, hence failing the requirement set at WP:NFOOTBALL. With that said, the player is non-notable; so, by my current knowledge, I'd assume it could be deleted through A7.  smithers  - talk  06:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Being a non-league footballer is not adequate for an article, and minor crimes (even if they receive some news coverage) do not make a person notable.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment has a lot of coverage with all major news covering it as it is relevant to the aftermath of Lee Rigbys murder. Was jailed because of this and is very relevant. Dave006 (talk) 09:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - but still WP:BLP1E, though agree is a notable part of the wider murder trial and warrants a mention at Murder of Lee Rigby. Fenix down (talk) 10:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.