Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun van Eeden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete on the consensus below. I further note that, so far as I can tell, neither of the teams for which he has played appears to have an article, and it is more likely that they are worthy of coverage than that any individual player is. GRBerry 17:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Shaun van Eeden

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't get it. I typed this into Twinkle and it didn't make the page for some reason.

Anyway, per this edit on my talk page, an anon has asked me to put the page up for deletion. By my own judgment, I think that the anon is right on the money here -- there's nothing that claims any notability for this particular cricket player. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delere per WP:N and WP:RS. STORMTRACKER   94  19:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Newport Pagnell Town 1sts? You must be joking. NN. DWaterson 23:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I feel at this stage in his career Shaun lacks suitable notability!  Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere!  (Whisper...) 10:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

you bastards....what i wrote down was perfectly reliable information. if you go the morrants four counties website you will see for yourselves —Preceding unsigned comment added by Superspurs (talk • contribs) 14:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)