Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shavparosnebi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:09, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Shavparosnebi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable, only two refs, both in Georgian language. First appears to be associated with the subject of the article, but I'm not sure due to machine translation. GregJackP  Boomer!   03:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 07:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 07:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

*Delete It would help if the article was better written but this appears to be an organization which is maybe one year old with a couple of media mentions. The notability has not been established.Peter Rehse (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Despite the nominator's statement, the Georgian Journal ref is in English and does focus on the group in a notable way. Here's another yet another English-language news ref. I'm seeing a pattern of rather sloppy noms and speedies from this editor, I'm sorry to say. Oppose. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep They are featured in a photo essay and article by EurasiaNet, and I found a blurb on humanrights.ge about a protest they organized. Ya, the article needs hellacious editing, but I think the four sources provided so far are enough to establish notability for an organization. Don't delete it because it's WP:RUBBISH. Braincricket (talk) 05:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Week Keep I am changing my delete (see above).  Thanks to the rewrite by Braincricket it is much easier to form an opinion and far easier on my literal sensitivities.  I say week since it is still a small organization as far as martial arts goes although it does have some peculiar characteristics.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Peter, I crossed out your delete vote (to avoid confusion), but left your comment. Papaursa (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep I came across this article when it was first written and it has been greatly improved, both in content and sources. I'd like to see more sources, but I think there's enough (barely) to warrant inclusion. Papaursa (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.