Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn HibmaCronan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:14, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Shawn HibmaCronan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a non-notable artist. I am unable to find any substantial coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ARTIST. - MrX 15:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There's not much yet in terms of substantial coverage, but a solo exhibition at the Oakland museum may be reason enough. 2601:188:0:ABE6:C048:DEE1:CB96:83AA (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I find mentions, mostly in announcements and listings, but the only sources here that are truly about him are from his web site, or from blog/bloggy sources. He doens't seem to have notability beyond the immediate SF Bay Area. None of the sources are what I could call "strong." LaMona (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -One solo museum show and little substantial coverage does not seem to be enough to meet WP:Creative  This may be a case of WP:Too Soon ABF99 (talk) 00:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now and draft and userfy as I found a few links at News and browser but certainly not much. SwisterTwister   talk  04:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches turned up brief mentions, but not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.