Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Oakman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 20:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Shawn Oakman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Queried speedy delete, has been discussed at Deletion review/Log/2015 January 4 (there, click on "[show]"). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep There are enough sources to pass GNG. He is not run of the mill, as he was a first team All-Big 12 selection and was also named an All-American. He was also regarded as a likely first round NFL Draft pick this year if he had entered. But most importantly the sources are there for GNG--Yankees10 17:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per Yankees10 and WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 07:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep looks like he clearly passes WP:GNG to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not a strong case, but enough coverage to meet WP:GNG, with both sports-related content and the recent social media virality. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 10:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.