Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Quinn (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:14, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Shawn Quinn (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Quinn, who is a Libertarian, lacked significant press coverage and has most likely never held political office. He received 1.46% of the vote and reportedly 0.6% of the vote in 2014 and 2018, respectively. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC); edited 09:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 31.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete fringe party candidate with no other notability as per Baltimore Sun: "Quinn... served in the U.S. Navy for 20 years, from 1980 to 2000. He’s also worked with the American Red Cross, in law enforcement in Newport News, Virginia, and is currently a government contractor, according to his website.. Fails WP:NPOL, WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to Maryland gubernatorial election, 2018. Failed candidate fails WP:NPOL. Flesh out information about the candidates in the election article. Bkissin (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Maryland gubernatorial election, 2018. Fails WP:NPOL. Chetsford (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep it, the article has more than 5 sources, and it is about a candidate for Governor of one of the States of the United States, the importance of the article is implicit in the importance of the event.--Leglish (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't see how that's going to prevent this article from getting deleted. You haven't added anything new yet. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Maryland gubernatorial election, 2018. Essentially a campaign brochure, and he won't win. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 21:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they have not yet won — no, not even at the gubernatorial level. To qualify for an article, he would need to (a) win the election, (b) already have a strong claim to preexisting notability for other reasons, besides the candidacy itself, that would already have gotten him an article on those grounds anyway, or (c) receive so much more coverage than most other candidates across the United States are also getting that there would be credible grounds to claim his candidacy as a special case over and above most other people's candidacies. But none of those things are shown here at all — and the fact that a bit of campaign coverage exists is not a free WP:GNG pass that exempts a candidate from having to pass NPOL just because of that campaign coverage's existence, because every candidate always gets some campaign coverage, so every candidate would always get that free pass and NPOL would automatically be gutted as having no applicability at all anymore. Bearcat (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat. SportingFlyer  talk  00:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Low octane political ad for an unelected politician. Carrite (talk) 17:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat. Winners, not candidates, meet notability criteria for WP:NPOL. Ifnord (talk) 03:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.