Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Vulliez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  23:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Shawn Vulliez
Flash animator. Fails WP:BIO with a venegeance. In addition, there are no reliable sources for any of the information in the article. See also David Firth, Jazza. Delete, or at least merge into The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny - Motor (talk) 14:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. He's on the cusp of notability thanks to The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny. --Billpg 18:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, Ghits for "Shaun Vulliez"... 70. No sources, not even the notoriously internet biased ghits... there is just no way this guy justifies a bio article on the basis of a barely notable flash animation. - Motor (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; nn-bio-cruft, with additional stigma of unverified (and apparently unverifiable?) KillerChihuahua?!? 21:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Billpg. --FlyingPenguins 04:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, there's tons of articles about internet animators. Sources will come, leave it be for now. --Liface 18:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Relevant to the EBaum's World article and ebaumsworldsucks.com. --M414
 * Comment... so? I continue to ask a simple quesion on these biographical articles and get no answer. Where is the reliable information for this person, per WP:BLP? This man is clearly not notable, since he has virtually no Ghits (which given that he's an "internet personality" should be flattering him) and played a role in a very minor internet WP:MEME. There is absolutely nothing here that could possibly justify or fill an biographical article... and yet people still vote keep without a single worthwhile argument to back it up. - Motor (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.