Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Vulliez (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Th ε Halo Θ 16:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Shawn Vulliez
Re-nominating. Shawn Vulliez, although I respect him as an Internet artist, fails to meet WP:BIO. He's great! But we have policies about this sort of thing, and unless we can find that articles have been written about him in major publications or the like, I think this article needs to go. If he becomes famous according to the standards laid forth by Wikipedia guidelines in the future, then we can bring back the article. --Dwiki 05:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep There is a bit of notority with his Lemon Demon work, especially Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny. (Which after hearing about it for some time, I finally just now saw it and it's Gay parody. They're both...interesting.) Agne 17:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. May be notable later, but at the moment appears to be yet another internet flash-in-the-pan. MikeWazowski 17:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable artist, as the co-creator of Ultimate Showdown and ebaumsworldsucks. --Billpg 12:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. More notable than Squilliam Fancyson, and more interesting. Also a real person, who is not on TV, which is rare on WP. --Bcsr4ever 05:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain. In my opinion, we should seperate *ahem* "bio sections" from internet cartoonists.  He is famous through The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny, and he is a pretty good animator in my view, but I really can't decide what to do, so I'll abstain and not change my thought.  --Wartys Neryon 01:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.