Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawtee RE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 01:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Shawtee RE

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely advertorial-toned WP:BLP of a rapper with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. In addition, the sourcing here is overwhelmingly bloggy, not even approaching the outermost edges of the amount of reliable source coverage it would take to claim WP:GNG instead of NMUSIC — even the one "source" which counts for more than the others in principle, hiphopcanada.com, actually just links to that publication's front splash page rather than to any actual content about her. (And if I do a content search on her name once I'm there, I still just hit a handful of blurbs which confirm her existence, and nothing in the way of substantive coverage for anything that could put her over NMUSIC.) No prejudice against recreation in the future if she can actually be properly sourced as accomplishing something that satisfies NMUSIC, but this as written is an advertisement for a person who's trying to become notable, not an encyclopedia article about a person who's already there. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: In complete agreement with all of the points brought up in the nom. Heavily promotional tone, and a search doesn't turn up much evidence of reliable, independent sources that could support notability under with WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. No substantial coverage from independent RS's in article or to be found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:14, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.