Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayama Prasad Shikshayatan High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dhubulia. To the extent it is sourceable, of course.  Sandstein  07:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Shayama Prasad Shikshayatan High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim of notability, not even affiliated to any central board. Additionally, it contains a laughably promotional tone. Redirect to Dhubulia if this article is not deleted outright — fr&thinsp;+  11:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment The school is listed with Govt of West Bengal Department of School Education as "DHUBULIA SHYAMA PRASAD SHIKSHAYATAN" (for example, a student is number 205 on this list) and on Google maps as Shyamaprasad Sikshayatan. Jack N. Stock (talk) 13:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep -- First of all, "no claim of notability" is not a reason for deletion. It's just not.  The putatively laughable promotional tone is also not a reason for deletion. We don't delete articles because of their tone, we edit them.  Therefore if nomination is in good faith, please provide genuine policy-based reasons for deletion.  Secondly, this is a high school.  It exists.  Therefore keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment--FR, D1-038 over this page indicates that it's affiliated to WBBSE. And, your nomination rationale is thus voided in entirety. &#x222F; WBG converse 16:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I would explicitly call for a delete due to a complete failure to meet GNG, (in the loosest of interpretations) but I fully expect that the School Brigade will appear to claim that they are more certain than native speakers of available sourcing (which is just not accessible.....) and hence keep this, as happens to all schools........ &#x222F; WBG converse 16:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * A more efficient way to deal with these stubs that lack sufficient readily-available sources for further expansion is to merge whatever small details are available to the school district or, in this case, the village or town, and replace the school article with an appropriate redirect. This response doesn't require an AfD, and can easily be reversed and further discussed at the talk page if there is an objection. If an editor later finds more sources and more information, the school article can be split off. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I still believe that the subject of the article in question is non-notable mainly due to the chronic unavailability of reliable third party sourcing. Additionally, I have struck the misleading portion of my rationale. — fr&thinsp;+  14:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * P.S. I have sourced the article with that one affiliation source, removed the promo stuff and added a maintenance template to it. Regards — fr&thinsp;+  17:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge with Dhubulia, as suggested by . Cordless Larry (talk) 08:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with article on the relevant article. We should do this for lots of school actually.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.