Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaz Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, and much improved. -- Mojo Hand (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Shaz Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Actor without significant credits; would have gone PROD BLP but there's an IMDB link in the article. Fails both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Also looks like it's either autobiographical or created by an editor with a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per nominatior. It looks like the IMDB entry was created by the same author as a promotional push.  Both have the same essay-like feel to them.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep He had a lead role in Moor, a much talked-about movie which was Pakistan's submission to the Academy Awards. Thanks to which, detailed, reliable sources are easy to find:, , , . Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to (Moor (film) as he altogether seems best known for that, his IMDb-listed works show nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly passes the general notability guideline as evidenced by the sources in the article and cited above by Biwom. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than one starring role in major films, enough coverage to satisfy the GNG. --Michig (talk) 07:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is now sufficiently sourced to verify subject meets the basic notability guideline for people. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.