Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She Dick (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  02:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

She Dick
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Burnberrytree had some technical problems when nominating this article for deletion. I found this posted on the notability noticeboard by Burnberrytree:

"I don't know how to re-nominate the band She Dick for deletion. Although the former result from years ago is keep, the sources presented for notability only come from local papers where the band is based (Dallas). The band has not charted, has no reviews, has no awards, and is an "orphan.""

prior AfD discussion: Articles_for_deletion/She_Dick — rybec   08:36, 11 March 2013 (UTC) 
 * Keep, good deal of secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 14:07, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * To the administrators: it might be appropriate to let this run until the 19th. I didn't put the proper headers on this page until 01:50, 12 March. — rybec   23:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I want to agree with Cirt here, but almost all that coverage is from July 2007--I don't see more than a flash in the pan, a 1E kind of blimp, so right now I'm leaning delete. The first AfD leaned keep, but only by a hair; if there is nothing further than we should conclude that this is not in fact notable. Drmies (talk) 15:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme (  talk  )  11:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - But just barely. Subject meets at least two criteria in WP:BAND, article has multiple sources (albeit only local) that meet WP:RS. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  19:50, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, per Uncle M. Secondary source coverage has only improved (mainly from New York publications since 2009, e.g. ).  Needs expansion/adoption.  –  SJ  +  05:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete barely notable doesn't cut it here if we are dealing with topics like BLPs and Bands, the only reliable sourcing I have seen is from the local news media in a one month area, easily fails WP:GNG as that isn't considered to be significant, independent coverage of the band, it needs more sourcing outside Dallas and a concert performance video (albit from Brooklyn but still....) Secret account 21:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Per WP:BAND I'll give the group some leeway, they have at least a reasonable degree of notability. Ducknish (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete fails criteria of WP:BAND, and I don't consider those mentions in local blogs/the Dallas Voice substantive coverage, they read like promo material. Hekerui (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.