Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She with a Broom, He in a Black Hat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 16:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

She with a Broom, He in a Black Hat

 * – ( View AfD View log  with a  Broom,He in a Black Hat )


 * Non-notable Soviet Union film, does not appear to have received notable coverage in English or Russian (WP:GNG).--RTY9099 (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:26, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Quite a few mentions in Russian sources in GBooks. My gut instinct is that there is likely enough coverage from former soviet countries from the era of its release. A Google search isn't sufficient here. --Michig (talk) 07:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig. Wikipedia has a fairly low bar for inclusion of films, and this article is certainly not advertising (and the film is from 1987). It's a film with notable actors, a musical with a notable composer, and tells a story including notable Russian folk characters. I'd say keep. It's often difficult to immediately find Russian information on the internet, and Michig says the film is mentioned in quite a few Russian sources in GoogleBooks. Softlavender (talk) 13:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources book coverage, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.