Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shearman & Sterling pro bono work on behalf of Guantanamo detainees


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Shearman & Sterling pro bono work on behalf of Guantanamo detainees

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Starting from the name and working its way down, the article is inherently WP:SYNTH There is no coverage specifically on the work this firm did for Guantanamo detainees.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 17:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into an article regarding the legal cases of the Guantanamo detainees. I agree that there is no reason to believe Stimson was referring specifically to attorneys employed by Shearman & Sterling, but in the context of a larger article this implication would not be present. Dcoetzee 17:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The  article originally had a different title: "pro bono work on behalf of Guantanamo detainees", though even then it covered only these three attorneys.    DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A sentence on the Shearman & Sterling page already adequately summarizes this topic. The rest is WP:SYNTH. Uncle Dick (talk) 04:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The title is an unlikely search term, and anyone can add a sentence or two about this elsewhere, if desired. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  02:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.