Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shearography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn  by nominator without any delete !vote. Jclemens (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Shearography

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No third party, reliable sources sources provided or found Active Banana    (bananaphone  17:52, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I didnt think to check google scholar as the term seemed to be promotional advert jargon. I would like to withdraw the nomination. Active Banana    (bananaphone  21:00, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. I found a number of sources on Google scholar, and added two of them to the article.  I don't understand heads or tails of them, but it does appear to be a real thing that is being written about by science types.  It would be nice if a science type would come make this article more accessible to laypeople. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:10, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - obviously a serious subject matter; also found an existing article here which seems to be a subset of shearography. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.