Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheetal Mafatlal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   G10 Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Sheetal Mafatlal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There are WP:BLP issues here, but I'm declining the db-spam speedy deletion because I don't see who it would be promoting ... certainly not the subject. - Dank (push to talk) 17:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 17:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dank (push to talk) 17:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a gross BLP violation or hoax. The linked articles don't even mention this person. A google news search finds only a violation for not paying duty on some jewelry, and nothing about prostitution. Therefore not-notable. It could be speedied as an attack page. Priyanath talk 17:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The subject will pass WP:N and not a case of WP:BLP1E. However, this article is filled with copy-paste copyright vios. Second section of article, first section of the article is the caption with the photo on the home page. Speedy Delete per G12 and also regular Delete per WP:NOTNEWS -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and to add to your choices, Speedy Delete per G10, as there's no mention of the prostitution racket on the refs or on Gnews. The arrest coverage. Take your pick from the three choices for deletes. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G10. Salih  ( talk ) 18:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll speedy per G10, but I'd appreciate someone else closing. - Dank (push to talk) 18:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.