Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shehr-e-Ajnabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to A-Plus TV as a viable ATD Star   Mississippi  15:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Shehr-e-Ajnabi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't even find ROTM coverage, much less sig/in-depth coverage, so clearly fails GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Nominator appears to have copied and pasted the nominating rationale for another rush of AfD nominations, despite the numerous times others have cautioned the nominator about making a lot of nominations in a rush, so I am copying and pasting this relist remark. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 09:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to A-Plus_TV - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  13:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Same rationale for almost every nomination. I am doubting WP:Before is done or not. It was broadcasted in 2013 and many Pakistani newspapers remove old coverage from their websites. Why a series broadcasted in 2013 need nomination discussion after more than a decade, and if its the case then all the old films/television related articles should be removed from wikipidea. It received some coverage as one can see here . Libraa2019 (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Libraa2019, Again - This is a WP:ATA. Unless the source is unreliable or dubious, old archives can always be found. If you doubt that I haven't done WP:BEFORE, why don't you provide some solid coverage (not some Google searches or even ROTM coverage) from RS that help establish WP:GNG, instead of doubting my intentions? — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.