Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Abu Adnan (Mohamad Kammoun)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Sheikh Abu Adnan (Mohamad Kammoun)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

does not seem to meet WP:Notability or WP:BIO standards, no inline citations but this person, as per the article, does not seem to have made significant advances in their field and does not seem to fall inline with any of the issues in WP Notability for an academic.  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 02:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
 * 2) The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
 * 3) The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE)
 * 4) The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
 * 5) The person holds or has held a named/personal chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
 * 6) The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at an academic institution or major academic society.
 * 7) The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
 * 8) The person is or has been an editor-in-chief of a major well-established journal in their subject area. Teamtheo (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong delete no notability whatsoever. DRosin (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.