Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila (Ugly Betty)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. extransit (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Sheila (Ugly Betty)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No independent reliable sources indicate the notability of this minor fictional character. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PLOT. PROD removed by editor who habitually de-PRODS articles at the rate of three or more per minute, but this character is already covered at List of Ugly Betty characters and the article's name is an extremely implausible search term, so neither merge nor redirect is required. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm a fan of the show, but I had no clue who this character was. According to IMDb, she appeared in only three episodes. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cow. I would also urge JClemens to exercise restraint when deprodding articles, because the current indiscriminate deprodding rampage is creating unnecessary work. Reyk  YO!  22:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - She has appeared in 3 episodes, which means she isn't a major character and apparently not significant enough to return post 2007. Looking at the article, she doesn't appear notable and the page is just plot info. Probably better suited to be covered on a season page or episode page.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  22:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for Rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.   Snotty Wong   confabulate 00:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * CLARIFY: The article under discussion here was tagged for Rescue by anonymous IP 32.175.46.37 in seeking assistance with its improvement.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources. And good luck changing the behavior of the inclusionists.  I do what I can to counteract their official organization.   Snotty Wong   confabulate 00:00, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG - no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, no notability. There's more of an independence issue than a reliability issue - you could theoretically cite the original programs to verify claims in the article, but the show obviously can't be used to substantiate notability. Whoever tagged this for rescue doesn't understand what the ARS is for, because per WP:PLOT, it's unencylopaedic. Claritas § 20:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no verifiable evidence of notability. see WP:VERIFYNOTABILITY. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.