Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Bleck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Sheila Bleck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is one of many similar articles that completely fails GNG. Furthermore the sourcing that exists in the current state are not from reliable sources. little green rosetta $central scrutinizer (talk)$ 03:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- total fail of WP:GNG, reliable sources are entirely lacking. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 04:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see nothing that would demonstrate WP:GNG, most links lead to subject's social networking sites, and poor coverage in others. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 04:46, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 10:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete couldn't find substantial coverage from reliable sources. ---GRuban (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete — per nom. Salt might be appropriate given the creating editor's other repeated recreations. JFHJr (㊟) 14:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete – Is simply a promotional article. – S. Rich (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.