Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Crowley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as author-requested. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  15:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Sheila Crowley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person's claim to fame is being involved in an organization, National Low Income Housing Coalition, that itself is barely notable and its page was started only a few days ago and has issue tags.

All of the substantive information here is from her own organization's (National Low Income Housing Coalition's) website, and the 5 "refs" are just passing mentions and quotes in various publications, not really GNG. JesseRafe (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I can find places where she is quoted in her capacity as director, but none of those are about her. There are a few other non-profit organizations that report on her retirement (, and I can find her in a directory, but none say much about her. Also, the article on National Low Income Housing Coalition was done by the same user User:ElbowRite and fails in many ways including style. If any of this is kept I would suggest userfying and sending the user through AfC because they still need to learn the basics of article construction. LaMona (talk) 04:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment (Deletion nominator) This should be merged, at least, with her organization. Both of which are probably non-notable enough. But there's so much extraneous information in both these articles that it is undue weight. JesseRafe (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.