Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Fougere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Sheila Fougere

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Single-sourced BLP of a person notable only as a city councillor and non-winning mayoral candidate in a city not large enough to carry its city councillors over WP:NPOL. As always, city councillors are not automatically granted a presumption of notability just because they exist -- outside the very narrow range of internationally famous global cities, a city councillor gets a Wikipedia article only if she can be extremely well-sourced as more than just locally notable for more than just the fact of existing as a city councillor. But with just one source here, which is local coverage in the context of announcing her unsuccessful run for mayor, that standard has not been satisfied. Bearcat (talk) 22:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete too low a level politician to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 00:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a largely unsourced vanity page on a non-notable politician. An unacceptable BLP article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:08, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.