Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Kay Davis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Sheila Kay Davis

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not notable JDDJS (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: The high point of this actress's career has been her performance in a supporting role in an Off-Broadway musical, albeit a long-running one.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * By support, do you mean keep or delete? The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 04:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep- I think the article asserts enough notability here; I'm no expert in this field, but it seems that she's notable enough for an article. The only reason I PRODded it was because it was an unsourced BLP, and had no sources; now that it has sources, I see a decent claim to notability. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 01:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:MUS and WP:ENT. I really don't think she's notable, at least at this point in her career.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It's borderline, for sure; I'd tend towards leaving it be, but I don't have a strong feeling either way. It might be the sort of thing someone could userfy, though.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 20:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.