Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheilah Gashumba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:34, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Sheilah Gashumba

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It does not meet notability requirements, no reputable sources cover this individual instead it is just blogs and Ugandan news sites. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesrichards12345 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:48, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete highly prmotional article for minor media figure. DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The article looks very promotional. The inclusion of excessive inline citations is evidence that the subject isn't notable. None of the awards the subject won (or was nominated for) is notable.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 01:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Part of string of highly promotional articles by this editor on entertainers that fail WP:GNG. Heavily WP:REFBOMBed. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment the article is obviously promotional but AfD is not cleanup. The subject has been covered in multiple independent reliable sources. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 06:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.