Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheillah Molelekwa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 16:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Sheillah Molelekwa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 22:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - This nominator is making a bad faith, wholesale attempt to remove Miss Universe contestants. Each of them has achieved two events, their National win and their participation in the heavily media covered Miss Universe pageant.  All of these Noms should be rejected now and the nominator The Banner should be banned from making such nominations in the future.  This one already got covered in Time magazine wearing her national costume.  After I'm through locating the damage this user is trying to do, I'll try to come back to add more sources, sources I know exist because they exist for all contestants of this worldwide televised, publicized event. Trackinfo (talk) 10:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Could you please stop with your personal attacks? The Banner talk 10:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (gossip)  @ 19:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep per Trackinfo.--Tomwsulcer (talk)`
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 04:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep There seems to be fairly substantial coverage of this individual. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.