Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhey pind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. standard practice for places  DGG ( talk ) 18:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Shekhey pind

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since 2010, I am sure it exists (although google maps couldn't) but no indication of notability Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 16:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment If it exists, WP:GEOLAND will be met, since wikipedia has a gazetteer function. But I'm struggling to prove its existence. Anyway, a redirect to Jalandhar district does no harm. Keep per its verified existence.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 02:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. Shekhey pind mainly exists in Wikipedia mirrors. Searching for Sheikhe pind in Jalandhar district gets several its for its post office. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. It exists (as agreed by nom), has a post office, with a PINCODE of 144025. It maybe that the better spelling is Shekhe Pind. Under that spelling, at the Indian census page we find that it has the village code of 030344. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, per excellent research done by User:Carlossuarez46 above. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.