Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldon Hawkes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to CSI:NY. However, should target choice change, that can be handled editorially Star   Mississippi  13:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Sheldon Hawkes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only source in the article is an episode recap, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to CSI: NY. Spinixster  (chat!)  07:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Television.  Spinixster   (chat!)  07:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to List of CSI: NY characters. I hate deleting articles and think redirecting and merging here is a good idea as it means the info can be transferred here (and maybe condensed) and the article can be remade easily if someone finds sources demonstrating notability and real life context. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 23:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think merging to CSI:NY is a better idea DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect I agree with both the nominator, Spinixster  and DaniloDaysOfOurLives that a stand-alone article is unnecessary, and rather than delete it, we should point the user logically and directly to the content on the subject already available at a CSI article. Either of the above redirect targets is acceptable, with a slight preference for CSI: NY. Jacona (talk) 12:48, 9 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.