Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldon Pinnell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Sheldon Pinnell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Apparently non-notable dermatologist. I checked Google, Google news, and Google scholar and couldn't turn up any reliable sources which discuss this person's life and/or work in any detail. Googel Scholar did turn up a few papers he has published in reliable journals, but I don't see enough to satisfy the baseline conditions noted at WP:PROF. Based on this, and the likely conflict of interest involved in creating this article, it should likely be deleted. Jayron  32  15:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I am adding sources now and wanted to get out the basic info out that I had so far.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skincaretruth (talk • contribs) 19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)  — Skincaretruth (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Actually, both of the new sources look a bit better. Its helping.  Do you have any more?  -- Jayron  32  22:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF ukexpat (talk) 16:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I have attempted to verfiy the information and was unable to validate that he is either a diplomat of the American Board of Dermatology. Through I was able to find a source that states he was on the renowned lists stated, I could not find who published these lists. No reliable sources outside of the university and the companies he is affilated with. Agreed does not pass WP:PROF is the absence of independent sources. Calmer   Waters  16:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:BIO. South Bay (talk) 01:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanispamcruftisement (and incompetent one at that). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:18, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.