Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelley Emling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Shelley Emling

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Procedurally completing incomplete nomination on behalf of. I assume the deletion rationale is along the lines of "author who fails notability guidelines." For my part, I am neutral. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Per WP:AUTHOR, her book The Fossil Hunter has been reviewed by the New York Times, and by Nature. I could find no reviews on her Your guide to retiring to Mexico, Costa Rica, and beyond. -- Whpq (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep I was impressed by the publications she has worked for, but per Whpq reviews in The New York Times and Nature count towards notability. - Bilby (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:AUTHOR derives notability from (among other things) "multiple independent periodical articles or reviews". The Fossil Hunter in addition to the NY Times was reviewed in Nature, pbs.org, smithsonian.org and Washington Times.Jonathanwallace (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.