Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelly (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Brawl Stars. -- Scott Burley (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Shelly (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. See also Articles for deletion/Giant (Clash of Clans), a bundled nomination covering characters created by the same developer. CoolSkittle (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect to Brawl Stars, the mobile game that contains the character. MarkZusab (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Brawl Stars. The character is not independently notable, and the only sources are either brief mentions of the character while talking about the game as a whole, or just game guides.  The basic information on the character is already present in the main article, so a merge is not necessary.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to Delete rather than Redirect. Sergecross73 makes a pretty convincing argument below as to why this would not be a particularly useful search term. Rorshacma (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect (as suitable) - per the lack of Sig Cov in reliable sources. Brawl Stars seems the obvious merge/redirect target. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Brawl Stars per the above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 19:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, then redirect to Brawl Stars. To prevent future spurious recreations and discussions of this non-notable character.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:38, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless the redirected is fully protected i don’t see that as really doing much to stop someone determined to recreate the article.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * People are more likely to recreate an article when it’s as easy as a single click of the “undo” button, rather than rebuilding it from scratch. Sergecross73   msg me  22:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - fictional character not independently notable from its respectful video games. No RS coverage. While not overtly against a redirect, I don’t believe it’s particularly likely search term with its common name and character disambiguation present. Sergecross73   msg me  22:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.