Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelly Crane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:18, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Shelly Crane

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A search on Google, Google News and sites related to book publishing revealed no signs of notability. Besides bookstores, only relevant link I found was a Publishers Weekly news about recent self-published books. Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. Isabelle 🔔 20:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Isabelle 🔔 20:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Isabelle 🔔 20:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Isabelle 🔔 20:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Found no reviews in RS for WP:NAUTHOR or other coverage for WP:BASIC. Claim that she's a NYT bestselling author is technically true (see ) but being #21 on the NYT ebook bestseller list is not enough for N, IMO. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. While I'm having trouble finding coverage online, I urge editors to examine the Media & Press page on the author's website which looks like it has pointers to some promising sources. pburka (talk) 21:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * That's what makes this kind of frustrating. It seems like she's kind of on the cusp of being notable, as I'm also finding things like this, but it's falling short of things that I could use to really argue for a strong keep. Her website says she's landed on bestseller lists, but I'm having trouble finding which books and when. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Found the USA Today book - it was for a book that hit at #57 on the general fiction list. Not bad when you consider how much fiction would fall into the list at any given time but I don't know that this would qualify this as a notability giving source on Wikipedia. When the bestseller list qualification was added as a potential source of notability it was pretty specifically intended to be the top 10-20 type of listings. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.