Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelton Hull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Shelton_Hull
Vanity... or a joke --(Unsigned Comment left by User:Cuchullain)
 * Delete. Seems to be a real person, but non-notable and the article asks as many questions as it answers. Kevin 07:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * He seems to be somewhat published according to what Google can find. He seems to write almost entirely for Counterpunch.org, which, according to Alexa, is a moderately popular website. Perhaps we should let this article stay and just rework the everloving crap out of it. It needs lots of work to be sure. JHMM13 07:39, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This smells funny to me, like it's an attempt to create a reference for an invented persona. The absurdity and personal tone of the "facts" cited indicate either someone trying to create a "legend" or a satire. rodii 13:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: I call BS on this.  All record of his writings have been erased from the public record?  Oh, come on!  Vandal prank. Geogre 17:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - apparent joke page. If it isn't written as a joke, it most certainly has serious POV problems. 147.70.242.21 00:07, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it, but edit out the POV. Shelton Hull does in fact exist, and does in fact write for the Jacksonville, Florida, alternative magazine Folio Weekly.  Whether or not he is worthy of being included in the Wiki is a fair concern, but I will say that this entry is riddled with POV issues.  --  Jon Worth
 * Weak delete, not really encyclopedic. Stifle 22:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete NN Bio, salted with attack and a smoky hoaxy flavouring Pete.Hud 05:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * whoops! Turns out I exist, I didn't write the entry, and the entirety of its contents are true! The shark has been jumped with the anti-democratic changes to your site. Sorry. [sdh666@hotmail.com]


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.