Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenley Training Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Shenley Training Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Training grounds are not automatically notable, since notability is not inherited from Arsenal FC. The training centre itself fails WP:GNG as it has received little to no coverage in the media; from several internet searches I could find nothing even approaching significant coverage of the centre. Additionally, the article is written like an advertisement. Big Dom  09:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the facility is massive, and integral to an iconic football team. I just wish the article did more than rephrase the facility's website. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep - This article needs a lot more referencing. If this can be provided from reliable third-party sources, then the article should definitely stay. – PeeJay 13:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm seeing quite a lot of coverage, in particular this, this, this and this. The article needs a lot of work, but I think it can be rescued. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per rationale above. GiantSnowman 17:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Alzarian. I get the feling that this deletion may have only been called because someone can't be bothered to improve it. The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.