Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenmue Dojo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:43, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Shenmue Dojo
I don't deny the Shenmue Dojo may be a useful resource to many, but an entry here on Wikipedia is unnecessary - the article does not, and will never be able to due to it's subject - provide information that is relevant to readers. This article also relies heavily on dubious sources with no factual base. The majority of this article appears to be about Shenmue Dojo's web forum - this is not a solid enough base on which to build an article on Wikipedia. Translucid2k4 18:41, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The Shenmue Dojo is one of the biggest and well known sites dedicated to the game series Shenmue. It is well known amongst alot of web borwsers and having a article on it is not unnecessary as fans of shenmue could find there way to the websites through wikipedia.com. Also the site already exsist as an eternal link on the Shenmue article. The article does not rely on dubios sources nor does it lack a factual base as there are multiple external links linking viewers to specefic websites and topic in the Shenmue Dojo forum. Also keep in mind that this article has major room for expansion and also there are many other topics which are poorly structured (Lolly Badcock), biasly written (Joe Budden) and highly innacurate (many of the football players have there goal tally and APPS inncorectly written) yet none of these are never put up for any case of review. Dominus hp 21:16, 14 July 2006
 * Delete: fails WP:WEB. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 15:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge. If it is as well-known in the Shenmue community then why isn't it linked from that article? And since it is so tied to that topic, anything vitally important here could be mentioned concisely there, and done. Shenme 04:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and vanispamcruftisement. -- Wine Guy  Talk  04:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.