Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenyi Center of Chinese Medicine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:52, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Shenyi Center of Chinese Medicine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Shenyi Center of Chinese Medicine appears to be an advert with no RS to support its existence as notable, yet it has been up as a one sentence article for three years, with only its own web page advertisement as a “source”. Its creator has made no contributions to Wikipedia except to create this advertisement. An anonymous editor appears to be furthering this advert by posting a link attached to the completely unrelated “bear’s bile” paragraph, in the completely unrelated “endangered species” section of Traditional Chinese Medicine here, and again here, ignoring WP:UNDUE and WP:ADVERT (and the fact that it has nothing to do with the paragraph or section it was inserted in. This appears to have been done in order to create the appearance of not being an orphan, as explained in the edit summary here. That article should not become a directory of TCM suppliers, notable or not. Normally, it would qualify for a speedy deletion, but it has already been up for 3 years, so I am bringing it here. PPdd (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No justifiable reason for keeping this unnotable stub. -- Brangifer (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability. Gabesta449   edits  ♦  chat  21:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No sources, nothing to indicate notability. --MelanieN (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.