Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sher.pa (Company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:00, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Sher.pa (Company)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to have been created as advertising by the company (SPA of same name as company). No evidence of notability under WP:CORP or WP:GNG. All sourcing is fundraisings. WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage. This would be a PROD, but it had already been PRODed previously. David Gerard (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Procedural keep - It needs MOS and NPOV clean-up (WP:ATD) I don't understand what you mean by the sourcing is fundraising? -- Excutient Talk 10:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:CORP - fundraising is not sufficient to demonstrate notability. The key problem is as I said in the deletion nomination: no evidence of notability under WP:CORP or WP:GNG. You haven't presented any either. Do any such sources exist? - David Gerard (talk) 13:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is arguably some coverage in El Pais (google "sherpa site:elpais.com"), but creation by a SPA means a delete !vote for me. JBchrch   talk  22:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 11:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I conducted my own search and wasn't able to find in-depth coverage of the company / product in reliable sources. Routine reporting of capital-raising (based on statutory reports from the company itself to stock exchanges) is not significant coverage or independent coverage. The sources themselves are WP:RS business journals and the like, but nothing that I could find reached the level required to pass WP:GNG.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 11:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.