Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheraton Skyline Hotel at London Heathrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. WP:SNOW. Well done Blofeld and SusunW for the improvements.

Sheraton Skyline Hotel at London Heathrow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure of what to do with this one. References could probably be found, but they'd probably be mere notices or promotional--but it would depend how you looked on it. I can see a possible point for including all hotels of this level, or for merging them all in chains.  DGG ( talk ) 17:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets GNG. There's five page of hits in google books, with notable journals like Investors Chronicle & Financial World and The Architect's Journal documenting it..♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Prior to Blofeld's recent expansion I could understand the nomination but with the sources now present, it is clearly notable enough. Miyagawa (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep clearly meets GNG. Lots of promotional materials about what Qatar Airlines plans to do, which is speculative and promotional right now, but could lead to future expansion. Has been in news for decades as a business conference center, major employer and hospitality center from what I find in the London papers. Though it is a business, historic information that is not promotional is present. SusunW (talk) 21:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Major 4-star hotel, article may have originally been poorly written by a PR person, but that's not a reason to delete, that's just a reason to edit the cruft. Looks like the gnomes have gone to work to fix it.  Montanabw (talk)  02:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It was just my unsourced stub I think haha!♦ Dr. Blofeld  07:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * LOL, see, you could be paid to write that stuff!  Montanabw (talk)  09:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This article has way too many quotes, but the coverage from where these quotes come from meet notability. I would suggest cutting those and the article would read less like a news blurb and be closer to non-promotional. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.